Monday, June 30, 2014

Broken CBA Will Lead to Headaches for CFL

Editor's Note: The following was originally posted as a column for Nitsky's Notes on The Projector's website. The original can be found at http://theprojector.ca/stories/view/nitskys-notes3

Labour issues have found themselves in the sports pages with increasing frequency over the past several years. From football to hockey and basketball, it feels as though owners of one league or another are always squabbling with their players. Terms like revenue sharing, salary floor and collective bargaining agreement (CBA) have become just as common as hat trick, shutout or winning streak in every fan’s vocabulary.

The NHLNFL, and NBA all agreed to new collective bargaining agreements with their respective players’ unions since 2011, ending or avoiding lockouts. While in some cases, deals led to rollbacks of salaries or higher television revenues, in all three major leagues deals led to increased salaries for many players.
In March of 2013, the CFL signed a $40 million per year television contract with TSN through 2018. The deal is more than twice as much as the previous television contract, which paid the league $15 million per year.

With an expiring CBA, the CFL Players’ Association (CFLPA), which has been notoriously inept in the past, saw dollar signs. They promised their players the world. Revenue sharing. A salary floor. More guaranteed money.

Dollar signs are understandable. Professional athletes have a very small window where they can earn a living. Especially in a league like the CFL, where rookies and role players are making as little as $50,000 a year, anything the players’ association can do to help them maximize their earning potential is needed.
The CFLPA eventually ended up caving in negotiations. Revenue sharing, the hill they had promised to die on, never came close to happening. But there’s one issue the CFLPA also conceded that’s being overlooked, one that could prove disastrous in the future. This issue deals with player safety and head injuries.

Sports fans have been beaten over the head with concussion talk for the last several years. Brain trauma, the quiet room and chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) are as common as revenue sharing, salary floor and collective bargaining on the sports pages.

The CFLPA had a chance to make a stand for the health of their players with this CBA. The players had asked for independent neurologists — without any allegiance to the team, which, in theory, means they would have no motivation for sending potentially injured players back onto the field. The CFL, inexplicably, refused to bend to this basic request to improve player safety.

When Donald Washington was laying in a crumpled heap on Investors Group Field during the Winnipeg Blue Bombers’ preseason opener on June 9, days before the players would vote to ratify a CBA that refused to protect them, I couldn’t help but wonder what the league was thinking.

No revenue sharing, no salary floor, those things all make sense. The CFL and its teams have a hard enough time making money. Business margins are tight, and I don’t blame them for squeezing out every penny they possibly can.

But risking the health of your workforce and your most valuable assets isn’t just bad politics, it’s bad business. As research on CTE and concussions continues to progress, both the CFL and its players union are bound to find they’ve come up with a broken business model.


Unfortunately, that realization might just come at the cost of too many broken players.

Monday, June 16, 2014

Ray Rice and #YesAllWomen

Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in The Projector's online edition on June 9th, 2014 as part of my ongoing 'Nitsky's Notes' series for the student newspaper.

I’ve felt like my Y chromosome has been under attack this past week. If you don’t follow the Internet, or watch any type of news at all, the #YesAllWomen hashtag has been trending in response to #NotAllMen, which hit Twitter as thousands of men felt as though they were being lumped in with a mass murderer from California.
A 22-year-old-man killed Cheng Yuan “James” Hong, George Chen, Weihan “David” Wang, Veronika Elizabeth Weiss, Katherine Breann Cooper and Christopher Ross Michaels-Martinez near the University of California, Santa Barbara campus on May 23 before killing himself. This much we know.
Reports say he committed the crime because of his mental illness, because of his hatred of women, because he was a deeply disturbed young man. He was known to follow misogynist websites, and he publicly posted a video displaying his hatred of women and his frustration with being a virgin at 22.
The reports of why the killer chose to go on his rampage led to some men feeling the need to say that #NotAllMen are misogynistic and mistreat women. While this is probably true, it doesn’t really matter. The point has become that #YesAllWomen do experience demeaning behaviour from men.
So when the #YesAllWomen tweets started coming in (I’ll spare quoting the tweets here, articles with tweets are just the worst), I got defensive. While I bit my virtual tongue, inside my head I was thinking, “I don’t do that, that’s not me, I’m not that guy.” It took me a couple of days to realize that this wasn’t about me. This was about #AllWomen and what a lot of men put them through.
In February, Ray Rice beat his then-fiancée, now wife, in an elevator. Ray Rice knocked her unconscious and dragged her on the ground. Ray Rice held a press conference where he said of the incident, “failure is not getting knocked down, it’s not getting up.” Ray Rice’s wife, Janay Rice, apologized for “her role in the incident” at the same press conference. This much we know.
We can assume that this sort of thing might have happened before. We can assume it might happen again. Ray Rice has yet to be punished in any capacity by the NFL, a league that prides itself on “protecting the shield” and handing out harsh discipline to players that hurt its image.
In a world where women feel the need to start an online hashtag to show everyone how poorly they’ve been treated by men, what does it say when a sports idol — in the biggest league in the world — can knock his fiancée unconscious on camera and may not suffer any punishment? What does it say when that same woman apologizes for her role in the incident?
I think it says that it doesn’t matter if #NotAllMen are “like that.” Clearly, enough of them are. So go ahead #YesAllWomen. If you can put up with misogyny, violence, and sexism on a daily basis, my Y chromosome can deal with a hashtag.